conservOpunk MERCH!

buy unique gifts at Zazzle

Liberals and Democrats: PROVEN WRONG BY HISTORY

USSR / Communism is inevitable? WRONG

This really needs no further discussion. The glorious collectivist experiment known as the Soviet Union completely collapsed and is totally discredited in the historical record. Much like Italian Facism and Nazi Germany, the USSR belief that there is nothing higher than the power of the state led to inhumane imprisonment in the gulags, substandard conditions for its people including horrific food shortages, millions of political executions, and complete godless totalitarianism.

Remember our "un biased" media gave Gorbachev the credit for ending the Cold War, made him Time's "Man of the Decade" and supported his speaking tour where he made $100K a pop telling fawning liberal audiences how the Soviet Union didn't really collapse.

YIN: “If you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization: Come here, to this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate. Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.” —Ronald Reagan Speech at the Berlin Wall, June 12, 1987

YANG: "In another show of America's force to the world, when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan, Carter responded by boycotting the Olympics. And thus was a fearsome blow struck at little fourteen-year-old American girls who had spent their lives training for the Olympics." -- Ann Coulter

SDI or "Star Wars" won't work? WRONG

Wrong quite often over these past years actually. Most recently on Feb 21, 2008. An American missile, without a warhead or internal guidance system, hit a satellite that was moving at approximately 22,000 miles per hour from a ship that was sitting on swells in the Pacific Ocean.

This was the straw that broke the back of the Soviet Union. Not only could they not afford to create such a program, they couldn't come up with such a thing either and they all knew it. Cold War won. Liberals proven wrong, again. Who cares about the next Michael Jordon? Where is the next Ronald Reagan?

VIETNAM

All USA fault - we need to pull out. As soon as we did, the North Vietnamese turned their guns on Cambodia. The Killing Fields

History class on Senator Joe McCarthy? WRONG

While his tactics were over the top and at times brutal, Senator Joe McCarthy has been vindicated by the publication of the Venona Project in 1995. (you may have missed this MSMedia viewers). The term "communism" is today a vile word describing a failed ideology that brought misery and dispar to millions.

The Venona Papers released from Soviet archives vindicate McCarthy and showed an even greater communist threat than even he thought. More than 350 paid soviet agents held positions within the U.S. State Dept.

“we now learn that J. Edgar Hoover, Senator Joseph McCarthy, Roy Cohn, Elizabeth Bentley, Whittaker Chambers & company really got it right: all Communists are/were actual, or wanna be, Russian spies. We also learn that during the Cold War years (and even before) hordes of leftists were abroad in the land, stealing "our" atomic secrets (and God only knows what else) for delivery to Joseph Stalin.” - - William A. Reuben review of The Secret World of American Communism, Rights, 1995

In retrospect had McCarthy simply went after another sector of society in search of Communists (rather than Hollywood, where there WERE lots of them) then we would not have film after film portraying him in an unfair light. To be clear, "McCarthyism" still works as a term today as his tactics were not polite, but those lives he was ruining were indeed communist lives bent on the overthrow of the U.S. To the playwright outed as a Communist I point to the millions thrown into Soviet Gulags due to their personal beliefs. I am sure if they could have chosen the punishment of "not being able to be a playwright anymore" they would have jumped at it! Venona proves McCarthy was right.

Doomsday Environmental Predictions? WRONG

So now Africa gets to use DDT? Well that didn't take too long..! Thanks a lot Rachel Carson! 30 million dead Africans are in your debt. I still want to know who that scientist was who would eat spoonfuls of DDT to prove how harmless it was. Junk science won and lots and lots and lots of human beings died.

http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/09212007/profile2.html
http://www.rachelwaswrong.org/
http://www.rachelwaswrong.org/victims.htm

Ever notice how Global Warming slowly became “Climate Change?” If it gets hotter, global warming. If it cools, global warming. This is Junk Science 101 and the new religion of the left.

The jaw dropping mistake underlying all of this hysteria is thus: CO2 does not cause warming, WARMING causes a rise in CO2 ! We learn this in eighth grade. It is still true!

Weather Channel founder John Coleman has been an outspoken advocate for climate realism. This weekend, Coleman posted at his KUSI-San Diego blog an "Open Letter to Environmentalists" challenging them to campaign for "environmental goals on the basis of their own merit " while urging alarmists to "[l]et go of the global warming frenzy before it leaves [them] discredited and embarrassed."

Ethanol? WRONG! using food stocks for fuel has now created worldwide food shortages, plus higher prices on both food and fuel. We have the oil here... lets go get it!

Nuclear Energy? WRONG! we should tap this unlimited energy source NOW and fund it until it is powering every city in America. We have had this for decades and now fusion can be done without any waste. Hello? Hello?

Just look at the way liberals have undermined our nation's forest management efforts. Any credible forestry official will tell you that allowing vast regions of timberland to overgrow to the point they often do without thinning them out from time to time and putting in fire roads is a recipe for disaster. Yet, in spite of this common sense perspective, liberals still fight tooth and nail against anyone who tries to cut down a few trees. Their success in this regard has contributed to some of the most devastating wildfires in the history of this country, but do they ever take a step back and reevaluate their position in the face of evidence of its destructiveness?

Edward Daley RENEW AMERICA.com May 19, 2004

Meanwhile... CHINA plans to drill 60 miles of FL coast! Right Now.

The Bush TAX CUTS? WRONG

The democrats worst nightmare has come true. (No, no WMD's have not been found in Bagdhad) In what can only be seen as a sharp rebuke to liberals who think tax cuts shrink government revenue, tax receipts for corporate and individuals are up a nice 15% over last year. Again! Liberals/democrats believe that if you cut taxes you will decrease revenues. Once again that has proven to be a fallacy just as when Reagan cut taxes in the 80's and doubled government revenues in the process. When you cut taxes you give people and businesses an incentive to grow. More tax PAYERS = More tax REVENUE.

This question of increased tax revenues when corporate, capital gains and income taxes are cut was posed to Barrack Obama during a debate, to which he replied with the need to increase taxes as a "punitive measure" for the rich CEO's. Good Grief!

Let us also never forget that "Progressive" call to punish the rich with that Yacht sales tax increase a few years back. This not only did not raise any taxes (as the wealthy simply stopped buying the yachts) but thousands of workers were put out of work by this wrong headed liberal policy.

BILL CLINTON'S INNOCENCE? WRONG (really embarrassingly wrong)!

GUN LAWS? WRONG

The only gun control related law statistically proven to be effective are CONCEAL CARRY PERMIT laws...! These counties consistently have the lowest crime rates in the nation.

John Lott, a gun-control scholar, says the problems with such laws is that good intentions aren't enough. "What counts is whether the laws ultimately save lives. Unfortunately, too many gun laws primarily disarm law-abiding citizens, not criminals." He notes that some 40 states now have some kind of law allowing responsible citizens to carry concealed firearms. In most of those states, between 2% and 6% of all adults have such permits, thus giving citizens in a community the size of a university the knowledge that someone other than the local police will have access to self-defense.

Such laws have consequences. Mr. Lott and Bill Landes of the University of Chicago law school examined multiple-victim public shootings in the U.S. from 1977 to 1999 and found that when states passed right-to-carry laws, the rate of multiple victim public shootings fell by 60%. Deaths and injuries from multiple-victim public shootings fell even more -- an average of 78% -- as the remaining incidents tended to involve fewer victims per attack.

Letter to the Editor 2

It’s Official… White Folks are Least Racist!

http://www.nationaljournal.com/njmagazine/or_20080510_9994.php

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/05/14/navarrette/

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/04/jakes/index.html

Barrack Obama has given yet another race speech. We should have an over/under on this topic coming from his campaign. Mr. Obama recently told a crowd of supporters what to expect in the November election:

Obama - “We know what kind of campaign they’re gonna run. They’re gonna try to make you afraid. They’re going to try to make you afraid of… ME! They’re gonna say, you know, he’s young, he’s inexperienced, he’s got a funny name… did I mention he’s black?” (crowd roars with laughter)!

I have poured over the numerous articles, news reports, polls, and pundits and all seem to be continuing to focus on RACE as the main issue in the November election. And (naturally) all seem to come from the LEFT side of the aisle and feel America “isn’t ready” for a black American in the White House.

So let me get this straight… unless 100% of us vote for Obama come NOV then “we are not ready” for a black man in the white house? What a crock. Millions of Republicans (myself included) “were ready” for Colin Powell, Michael Steele, Lynn Swann, Clarence Thomas, Condi Rice, Walter Williams, Roy Innis, Ward Connerly, and Janice Rogers Brown to hold high positions in Govt (including the Presidency in Powell’s case). Where was the “goose bumps” and “momentous moment” speak in the media for these individuals?

Hmmm… what is the difference?

Oh yes, these are all conservative Black Republicans! Where was the cry of “Racism” when the LIBS were mounting disgraceful smears against these figures (from the Oreos hurled at Steele to the “modern day lynching” of Thomas in his nomination hearings)? The DEM party, from their historical racism to the nomination battle of 2008, have focused on IDENTITY POLITICS of race and gender, perfectly illustrated in the DEM nomination process. (Attention Mayor Bloomberg: this is wedge politics).

Of course there are racists in both parties. When will this change? Never! Man is imperfect and there will always be bigots out there. The LIBS don’t want to END racism they want to FIGHT racism. The truth is Powell would have beaten GW Bush back in 2000 for the REP nomination, and Black Republicans are elected all the time with little or no fanfare. Why is this? (rhetorical question - - the lib writers already know).

MLK stood for a colorblind society. These days all the media can talk about in the race is the RACE of the candidates and the RACE of the voters. This is a shame. Even the big lib commentators haven’t pegged this one yet… it is the views of the candidates and not their race that matters most to the electorate.

This election will feature (again) two mildly ho hum candidates in a lesser of 2 evils battle for the most important job in the world (after syndicated columnist of course).

You should all head over to the blog tonyoconservopunk.blogspot.com

The views are clearer and the writing is better.

ConservOpunk

STOP and THINK (pretty please)

For those of you against the Death Penalty:

By ANDREW O. SELSKY, Associated Press Writer 1 hour, 40 minutes ago

GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba - Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said he would welcome becoming a "marytr" after a judge warned Thursday that he faces the death penalty for his confessed role as mastermind of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Wearing thick glasses and occasionally fussing with his turban or stroking his bushy gray beard, Mohammed seemed noticeably thinner in his first appearance since his capture in Pakistan in 2003. It was a stark contrast to the image the U.S. showed to the world back then, of a slovenly man with disheveled hair, an unshaven face and a T-shirt.

Mohammed also sang verses from the Quran, rejected his attorneys and told Judge Ralph Kohlmann, a Marine colonel, that he wants to represent himself at the war crimes trial. The judge warned that he faces execution if convicted of organizing the attacks on America. But the former No. 3 leader of al-Qaida was insistent.

"Yes, this is what I wish, to be a martyr for a long time," Mohammed declared. "I will, God willing, have this, by you."

For those of you (in 2000) who claim the Popular Vote should determine the U.S. President:

http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26842

(Hint: the DEMS now have the exact opposite position they held 8 years ago. This is known in some circles as, what is that word again? Oh yes, Hypocrisy)

For those of you who deny Liberal Media Bias:

Tim Russert / Chris Matthews gush on Obama

http://abcrad.vo.llnwd.net/o1/levin/rss/levin06042008.mp3

No Difference Between the Parties? Ha!

LIBERAL v CONSERVATIVE

Talking Points - Facts

Multiculturalism - Melting Pot

Raise Taxes - Cut Taxes

Cut Military - Fund Military

General “Betray Us” - General Petraeus

Deterrent - Punishment

Egalitarianism - Liberty

Bill Clinton - Ronald Reagan

National Healthcare - Wal Mart $4 drug program

Fetus - Baby

Affirmative Action - Equal Treatment

Govt. Programs - Entrepreneurs

Toyota Prius GMC - Tahoe Hybrid

Johnathan Kozol - Ann Rynd

Global Warming - The Sun

Atheist - Christian

The Nation - National Review

Castro - Thatcher

April 15 - July 4

"The Population Bomb" - The Bible

David Dinkins - Rudy Giuliani

Gay Marriage - Civil Unions

Massachusetts - Texas

Give Peace a Chance - Free Tibet!

Collective “Village” - Rugged Individual

Stroke of the Pen - Law of the Land

Ruth Bader Ginsburg - Antonin Scalia

Keith Olbermann - Mark Levin

New York Times - Washington Times

Moveon.org - WorldNet Daily

No Drilling - Drill Now Pay Less

Chamberlain - Churchill

Appeasement - Military Action

No Growth Flat Earth - Technology and Development

Maureen Dowd - George Will

One Nation - One Nation Under God

Al Franken - Ann Coulter

John Kerry - John McCain

Trust your Govt. - Trust your Family

Maxine Waters - Condoleeza Rice

Tapas - BBQ

CNN - Fox News

MSNBC - CSPAN

The Weather Underground - The Guardian Angels

Excuses - Owning up

DEMS Doth Protest TOO MUCH

The Democrats doth protest too much, methinks

With thanks to Shakespeare to make my point, once again it will require 10 minutes of research and another 10 to type up my thoughts regarding the latest show of silliness by American Democrats.

After President Bush’s speech in Israel decrying the failure of soft appeasement of dictators and enemies of Freedom and Democracy worldwide, a speech in which he made no mention of any specific person or political party, the DEMS fell all over themselves to lambaste Bush’s insensitivity.

The Bush remarks: "Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," the President said to the country's legislative body, "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

Newsweek refers to the “speech most observers feel was referring to Obama” Bush “ended 60 years of not criticizing on foreign soil” and give Bush a “thumbs down” in their always hilariously biased weekly “Conventional Wisdom” feature.

Let me help a little – in a speech which drew tremendous support and applause from all within earshot (namely, Israelis) the collectively guilty conscience of Democrats in Congress and Left Leaning news organizations caused a telling reaction which perfectly “outs” the Left with regards to foreign policy.

They continue their appeasement loving, never learning from history, spineless march to oblivion. Rewriting history once enough time has passed, and thinking no one notices when they make fools of themselves in present day with their public outcries, the DEMS once again show their true colors.

Barrack Obama called this "divisiveness" and further remarked (in a narcissistic triumph): "George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."

Obama is amazing! On many occasions he has spoken of his willingness to meet unconditionally with terror supporting nations including Iran and Syria. This is hair splitting and equivocating at its finest.

Democrats clamored for an apology from Bush. For what? Telling the truth? Did he mention anyone by name? No, but as even the Democrats will tell you, he didn’t have to. We all know it is the Left who stands for a weaker U.S. and champions the world’s dictators from Castro to Chavez to Hussein. Insiders admit the President was actually referring to Jimmy Carter, whom has indeed met with these rogue states in recent weeks! Way to step in it DEMS!

If I were you (and thankfully I am not as my education actually took) I would get off this topic with urgency, as no headway will be made in the arena of ideas with these arguments supporting America’s defeat and defending yourselves against the truthful claims of foreign policy weakness. You cannot have an OPINION regarding historical FACT, and you are (again) on the wrong side of history on dealings with foreign dictators and evil within our midst.

Where are you "Reagan Democrats?" Do you really want these people representing you on the national stage? Do you really want to undermine our efforts and disrespect the American Military in this manner? Have you sold your soul to party and can ignore the history of tyranny failing everywhere it has been tried, enslaving its people under the socialistic themes of "Fairness" and "Equality" for all? This is disgraceful.

For broader historical reference, the current era does represent the first time for organized American opposition to the establishment of a Democracy in a foreign country. Congrats!

Isn’t this always the DEMS issue? Not the factual and truthful nature of Republican statements, but the FACT they are MAKING them? Again I challenge anyone to point out any factual mistakes or anything you may believe not to be true. As I have always said "the Truth Hurts... Liberals" and this occasion is no exception to the rule. Hmmm that would look good on a t shirt huh?

So would this:

Democrats… Shooting the messenger since 1964

ConservOpunk

Wal McPharmacy MART

Wal McPharmacy Mart

Drugs for four dollars. There are hundreds of prescription drugs that are available for purchase for only $4. That is not your co-pay. That is the price. Four bucks. Less than a trip to Taco Bell. Even BRAND NAME drugs only cost $10 which is the same as most co-pays. But the $4 deal covers a large number of the most doctor prescribed drugs on the market.

Wal-Mart has (once again) used it’s “buy in bulk” economy of scale leverage to get great pricing. Not only can you now buy a cheap throw rug, some plastic “made in China” spoons, and the latest CD by what’s-his-face from American Idol, you can heal yourself with some $4 drugs! Sign me up! Oh wait, I already did that!

As soon as I heard of this deal I transferred all my prescriptions from my current pharmacy to “the Mart.” It was easy. By utilizing my internal combustion technology in my Toyota 4runner, I glided thru the parking lot and made my way inside. There were 4-5 friendly pharmacists and, since this Wal-Mart was relatively new, there were few filled prescripts ready for pick up. Upon viewing the spacious shelves I told them to “get ready – you all are going to start getting very busy.”

Who is in charge of marketing for this behemoth? The word is not getting out fast enough. This should be gospel to every man woman and child in America. Oh, and especially you cradle to grave entitlement Democrats out there. Can you remind me why exactly some are clamoring to turn over our healthcare to the Feds again? I think Wal-Mart may be the smart pick here.

Wal-Mart $4 Drug Program:

http://www.walmart.com/catalog/catalog.gsp?cat=546834&fromPageCatId=5431

Okay now… Hillary-Care or Wal-Mart? Obama Rama Socialist Care or Wal-Mart? Yours and my current set up with our current pharmacy that we have had for years and years without question and with no competition or Wal-Mart? I didn’t even have to do the math, it did me! Sweeping me off the couch and into the bright lights of the world’s largest retailer. I even stopped to buy a soda from the machine on my way out in order to swallow the cheap pills I just got… for FOUR BUCKS for a MONTH SUPPLY.

Not only that, but the week before I started in business for myself, dropping off my employer’s health insurance coverage. My very responsible (and very hot) girlfriend simply went online and shopped over the many readily available and truly affordable temporary insurance plans out there. I was able to get a 6 month plan even with some pre conditions of Health Insurance. This is to cover me in case I get hit by a bus (like insurance should be used in the first place). There’s a co-pay for doc visits and don’t even need to claim my drugs as they are only $4 a month. Here are some sites for your convenience:

http://www.affordable-health-insurance-plans.org/ahip/index.php

http://www.short-termhealthinsurance.com/

http://www.assuranthealthshortterm.com/temporaryhealthinsurance/

http://www.medsave.com/

http://www.temporary-health-insurance-plans.com/thip/index.php

And for you poor people out there (and I am not too far into the middle class not to relate) don’t listen to the demagogues in Congress tell you that you can’t afford coverage. Even if you make the Federal Minimum Wage (in which case you are eligible for numerous Federal Aid Health Programs anyway) it would take you only 2 days a month to earn enough money to pay for your health insurance. This is, as they say, a no-brainer.

Case closed.

Wal-Mart open.

conservOpunk Healthy.